1990 Audi 90 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Audi 90 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 428 more horse power than 1990 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 90.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 90 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 90 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2890 mm |