1990 Austin Maestro vs. 1966 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1990 Austin Maestro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 1300. (57 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 102 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Austin Maestro | 1966 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Maestro | 1300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1273 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 53 L |