1990 Austin Maestro vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1990 Austin Maestro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1990 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1990 Austin Maestro.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Austin Maestro | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Austin | Caterham |
| Model | Maestro | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1273 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 36 L |
