1990 Austin Maestro vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Austin Maestro would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 441 more horse power than 1990 Austin Maestro. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1990 Austin Maestro.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 528 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Austin Maestro. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1990 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1990 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Austin Maestro | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Maestro | CLS |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |