1990 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1990 Beijing BJ 212 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1990 Beijing BJ 212. (87 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1990 Beijing BJ 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Beijing BJ 212 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 1990 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Beijing BJ 212. (181 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Beijing BJ 212.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Beijing BJ 212 | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Beijing | Jaguar |
Model | BJ 212 | C-Type |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2066 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2450 mm |