1990 BMW 316 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1990 BMW 316 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1990 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 316 | 62 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3210 mm |