1990 BMW 316 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1990 BMW 316 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW 316 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1990 BMW 316.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 316 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |