1990 BMW 316 vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 1990 BMW 316 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW 316 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 30 kg more than 1990 BMW 316.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW 316 | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | 316 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 31 L |
