1990 BMW 316 vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 406 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | BMW | Marcos |
Model | 316 | Mantis |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 506 HP |
Torque | 141 Nm | 613 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |