1990 BMW 316 vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW 316 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1990 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW 316 (141 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1990 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 316 | Acty |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |