1990 BMW 316 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1224 kg more than 1990 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |