1990 BMW 316 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW 316 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1990 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 316 | K2700 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |