1990 BMW 320 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1990 BMW 320 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW 320 (148 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW 320 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 320 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1170 mm |
