1990 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 320 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW 320 weights approximately 301 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1990 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW 320 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 320 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2770 mm |
