1990 BMW 518 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 518. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 518 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1990 BMW 518. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 518. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 295 kg more than 1990 BMW 518. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 BMW 518 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW 518. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 518. (161 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 518.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 518 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 518 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 51 L |