1990 BMW M3 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1990 BMW M3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW M3 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | M3 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1990 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2040 mm |