1990 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1990 BMW M3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW M3 weights approximately 108 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | BMW | Singer |
| Model | M3 | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |
