1990 BMW M3 vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 1990 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW M3 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1975 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | M3 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 107 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2560 mm |
