1990 BMW M3 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1990 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW M3 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |