1990 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 1995 Rover 400 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M3 | 400 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2560 mm |