1990 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 15 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Puma |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 170 Nm |
Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2450 mm |