1990 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RSC. (194 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RSC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 196 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota RSC (284 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota RSC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | M3 | RSC |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 4164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2510 mm |
