1990 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | HSV |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 692 Nm |
Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 263 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |