1990 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Lancia Phedra
To start off, 2002 Lancia Phedra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Phedra. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Phedra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 310 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Phedra. (194 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Phedra.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2002 Lancia Phedra | |
Make | BMW | Lancia |
Model | M3 | Phedra |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 194 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2830 mm |