1990 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2002 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 220 Nm |
Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |