1990 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 302 kg more than 1990 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (443 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | M3 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 443 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1502 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |
