1990 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 40 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | M3 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2490 mm |
