1990 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 259 kg more than 1990 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M3 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 372 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1459 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 76 L |