1990 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 470 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | CTS |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 179 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 245 Nm |
Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2830 mm |