1990 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S
To start off, 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S (655 HP) has 421 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 BMW M3 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S (752 Nm) has 512 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 2005 Koenigsegg CC8S | |
| Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
| Model | M3 | CC8S |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 655 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 752 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 389 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4191 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1989 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1069 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2659 mm |
