1990 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1143 kg more than 1990 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | M3 | Charger |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |