1990 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-150 weights approximately 456 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3510 mm |