1990 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (238 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Epica |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |