1990 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 307 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 307, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 307. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 307.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2008 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | BMW | Peugeot |
Model | M3 | 307 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1468 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |