1990 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Evanda. (130 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 297 kg more than 1990 BMW M3.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Evanda. 2009 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW M3 | 2009 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | M3 | Evanda |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2467 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |