1990 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (238 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 350 kg more than 1990 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda Tribute (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3. 2009 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1990 BMW M3 2009 Mazda Tribute
Make BMW Mazda
Model M3 Tribute
Year Released 1990 2009
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2467 cc 2960 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 238 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 6550 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 4750 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1510 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.8 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.5 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.8 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]