1990 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW M3 (234 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW M3 (240 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 1990 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW M3 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | M3 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2467 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 224 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
