1990 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7

To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1990 BMW M3. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 458 kg more than 1990 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1990 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (349 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW M3. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW M3. 2010 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: