1990 BMW Z1 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW Z1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW Z1 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 BMW Z1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 BMW Z1 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 BMW Z1 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 50 kg more than 1990 BMW Z1.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 BMW Z1 (230 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1990 BMW Z1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 BMW Z1 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Z1 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |
