1990 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1990 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 123 kg more than 1990 Bristol Beaufighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Bristol Beaufighter | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Beaufighter | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2880 mm |
