1990 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 684 kg more than 1990 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Bristol Beaufighter | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
| Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
| Model | Beaufighter | Mark LT |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5406 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3520 mm |
