1990 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 112 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1990 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Bristol Beaufighter | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2649 mm |