1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick LeSabre (150 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 825 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Buick LeSabre | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Buick | Lancia |
Model | LeSabre | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 6.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1499 kg | 674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |