1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1990 Buick LeSabre. (150 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 501 kg more than 1990 Buick LeSabre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Buick LeSabre | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | LeSabre | 62 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1499 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3290 mm |