1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1990 Buick LeSabre. (165 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 599 kg more than 1990 Buick LeSabre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Buick LeSabre | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | LeSabre | 62 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |
