1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick LeSabre (150 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Buick LeSabre (271 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1990 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Buick LeSabre | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | LeSabre | 66 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
