1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Buick LeSabre. (115 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1990 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 286 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1990 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Buick LeSabre. (257 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Buick LeSabre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Buick LeSabre | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Buick | Lancia |
| Model | LeSabre | Nea |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2590 mm |
