1990 Buick LeSabre vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Buick LeSabre | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | LeSabre | Cheyenne |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1950 mm |