1990 Buick Skylark vs. 1964 Holden EJ

To start off, 1990 Buick Skylark is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,471 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick Skylark (110 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick Skylark weights approximately 65 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Buick Skylark (183 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1990 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: