1990 Buick Skylark vs. 2000 Ford TS-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick Skylark (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1990 Buick Skylark.

Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Buick Skylark (217 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1990 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.

Compare all specifications: